|
Post by Alydar on Apr 27, 2012 10:55:19 GMT
1. what happens if two players pick two of one number, (say 14.2) so that there was 4 of that card on the board. Then, if someone was to flip over two of those cards, whose cards would they turn up as? Okay, let me first address something wrong with your situation. One player may not pick the same number twice. They must send in 6 unique, rational numbers. They could instead send in numbers extremely close (e.g. 14.2 and (14.2 + 10^-999999999999999) or something), but those two would indeed be unique numbers. The only case in which a player will have multiple cards of the exact same number would be per inactivity rules (where the player would have two -1s, 0s, and 1s). Now let's say two players sent in the exact same number. When ordering the board, the two cards would be placed directly next to each other. However, their relative placement would be randomized. In other words, say players A, B, and C put a value of 14.2. The order could be either A, B, C OR A, C, B OR B, A, C OR B, C, A OR C, A, B OR C, B, A. The order is set at the beginning of the game and never changed, but there is no way for the players to figure out the order as it is randomized. 2. If two people picked the same number, let's say 14.2 again, and someone incorrectly matched one of those with one of his own cards, whose would the card come up as? See above. The numbers only determine the order of the cards. After that, they don't matter at all... After the board is setup, the cards are in their places, and they stay there. So if they pick the right card, they reveal their card and an opponent's, but if they pick the wrong card, they match their own set. How did I not read this before? xDD it was epic! Thanks! Glad you appreciate it!
|
|
Kokuryu
Gambler #12
165 Poker Chips
Posts: 184
|
Post by Kokuryu on Apr 27, 2012 12:58:04 GMT
Ahhh.... Thanks, didn't quite realise that, that helps quite a bit.
|
|
|
Post by 10k on May 2, 2012 11:47:58 GMT
I like the inside joke from that last voting phase message.
|
|
|
Post by Alydar on May 2, 2012 13:02:20 GMT
Hmm? Wait, what? I did an inside joke? Cool! Tell me!
|
|
|
Post by 10k on May 3, 2012 3:42:10 GMT
^I sent a PM, looks like you got it. ...Ah, it's good to know I haven't finished too far behind the next place.
|
|
Kokuryu
Gambler #12
165 Poker Chips
Posts: 184
|
Post by Kokuryu on May 3, 2012 7:03:29 GMT
And Shadow is finally out of the game!!!!
|
|
|
Post by ShadowFire on May 8, 2012 7:14:08 GMT
Thus comes the price of laziness. Enjoy your win, Kokoryu. You were centimetre's away from losing it.
Fufufu.
|
|
Kokuryu
Gambler #12
165 Poker Chips
Posts: 184
|
Post by Kokuryu on May 8, 2012 11:37:27 GMT
Thus comes the price of laziness. Enjoy your win, Kokoryu. You were centimetre's away from losing it. Fufufu. Well, I seriously didn't deserve to win this, I made plenty of in-correct assumptions. But hey, provided I'm not backstabbed again, I've currently got a deal going with the players left in this game for certain portions of the win in this game, so things 'should' go smoothly now. (The 'should' is indicated because this is liar game, and there's a good chance I might get backstabbed. :
|
|
|
Post by Alydar on May 9, 2012 0:40:55 GMT
Hmm... So, we may have a slight problem in continuing this game at this moment in time. Remember that phishing incident? NastyMan was one of those phished people. And now Adam's used the account for spamming, so we've disabled it. As of now, NastyMan has not replied to any of the numerous types of communication that I've tried to reach him at. Has someone been in contact with him recently or knows if he's still around/interested (you can tell us through PM or confessionals if you want)?
Without one of the players, it becomes difficult to continue this game, as I don't want to be unfair to him, considering the circumstances... As such, should we continue delaying this game? Or should we continue with him inactive (of course, we'll continue having the delay that's already in place...)? It's up to you guys really...
And I guess a similar question could be asked about Double Bluff... Of course, as it hasn't started yet, it's not as big of a deal if we start without him... So... what do you guys think we should do?
|
|
|
Post by Iain7 on May 9, 2012 6:15:00 GMT
Nastyman's inactivity pains me Dx
|
|
Kokuryu
Gambler #12
165 Poker Chips
Posts: 184
|
Post by Kokuryu on May 9, 2012 8:38:16 GMT
Well, it wasn't as if NastyMan was getting a vote in every round anyway... So this is my opinion: The rounds should continue in this game, as it's very close to the end... Also, I think double bluff should be delayed 1-2 days, as I actually know someone who can get in contact with him, it might take a little bit though.
|
|
|
Post by Alydar on May 9, 2012 10:41:13 GMT
Okay then. Liar's Memory will proceed as scheduled. We're still doing the activity sweep and recruitment for Double Bluff, and then we'll have a few days before it starts for any last-minute stragglers to join.
|
|
|
Post by 10k on May 13, 2012 16:52:04 GMT
You know, the nice thing about the game is that it had a Nao Kanzaki strategy. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
|
|
|
Post by Iain7 on May 14, 2012 0:47:08 GMT
I agree actually! Too bad you got shunted :PP
|
|
Kokuryu
Gambler #12
165 Poker Chips
Posts: 184
|
Post by Kokuryu on May 14, 2012 2:42:37 GMT
Yeah, I noticed it had a nao kanzaki strategy pretty early(Especially as Darconis folded), I talked to several players about it... Shadow really didn't want to do it, which is why I spent the entire game removing him. D: (To quote: and you really think that anyone will be satisfied with one bonus chip?)
I don't think I ever talked to you about it though 10k.... and I removed you from the game because I got reports from several different places that you were working with shadow... which I'm not so sure about anymore, which would make the fact that I removed you even worse. Sorry. :/
|
|